A practical example of information granularity by Jiro Kawakita
How much information will be written on each KJ method fusen, and how granularly will it be chopped?
https://gyazo.com/a5d925b42fd60b23da1dae01b5701d5e
The label on the left is made from a clean copy of it.
Each label sheet consists of two rows of small labels (4 cm long), 12 labels in total, affixed to a backing sheet. The individual labels are perforated so that they can be torn off from the backing paper as well. (p.121)
People unfamiliar with the KJ method may find it "very granular". Especially when you think of the so-called information card in the expression "writing information on a card and arranging it". I would think that a lot more text would be written.
On the other hand, many people write in one word when given a limited amount of time to make labels at a workshop, etc.
Writing a lot takes time.
https://gyazo.com/857b3aba09b72b756a5313fa08ef2586
Example of a picture on a label
The granularity of the nameplate after grouping
Often hear the comment, "Surprisingly long."
If you've categorized your labels, your nameplate tends to be the one word that represents that categorical category.
It's not just whether it's one word or not, but also the high percentage of verbs it contains.
It's hard to explain with verbs if you've classified them.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/川喜田二郎による情報粒度の実例 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.